The content was there. Finding it was the problem.

McGraw Hill's Open Learning Platform powered K-12 instructional content for teachers and students, but the way that content was structured made it difficult to navigate in practice. Teachers had to drill through multiple layers to find a single resource, and that friction disrupted the classroom moment when speed mattered most.

Focus
Navigation, information architecture
Users
Teachers, administrators, reviewers
Stakes
State-level adoptions
McGraw Hill's Open Learning Platform, showing the nested course structure that made content hard to find.

The hierarchy made simple tasks feel harder than they should have.

The platform's content model was deeply nested, with multiple layers that could each hold content or simply act as containers. In practice, teachers often had to click through several levels before reaching anything usable.

That structure slowed people down, broke their flow, and made content discovery feel heavier than it needed to be. For administrators reviewing the platform at a state level, it also made it harder to understand what was actually inside the curriculum.

Teachers needed to move quickly. Reviewers needed to see the whole picture.

The problem wasn't the same for every user. Teachers often knew exactly what they were trying to find and needed to get there fast. Reviewers were looking for the opposite: a high-level view that made the breadth and structure of the curriculum easier to understand.

The work had to support both experiences at once, without making either one feel compromised.

The existing navigation asked for too much effort up front.

To reach the course structure, teachers first had to open a separate Browse This Course view, then decide whether to enter a container or expand it, then continue drilling down until something actionable appeared.

That step-by-step model created unnecessary friction, especially during live instruction when teachers needed quick access and very little interruption. The deeper the structure went, the more work it took just to understand where useful content actually lived.

Too many clicks were spent uncovering structure instead of accessing content.

The hierarchy wasn't just complex, it was hidden. Users had to progressively unpack the platform before they could decide where to go next, which made navigation feel slow and opaque.

That made even well-organized content feel harder to use than it actually was.

The original flow, step one: the course page before any structure is visible.

Step one

Teachers first had to click Browse This Course just to expose the content structure.

The original flow, step two: choosing between entering a container or expanding it.

Step two

Each container offered a link into it or an arrow to peek inside, one level at a time.

The original flow, step three: the contents of a single parent folder.

Step three

Only inside the parent folder could a teacher finally see what it held.

The answer was to make the structure visible.

The redesign focused on making navigation more transparent, more persistent, and easier to scan at a glance. Instead of forcing users in and out of containers, the experience was restructured to keep the course hierarchy in view and make movement through it feel more direct.

A persistent left-hand navigation panel gave teachers immediate access to course content without losing their place, while a full-page table of contents created a higher-level view for broader scanning and faster orientation.

The redesigned view with a persistent navigation panel beside lesson content.

Content discovery

Lesson subject matter stays in view without jumping in and out of containers.

The full-page table of contents showing the entire curriculum in context.

35,000-foot view

State-level administrators can see all the educational content in context on one screen.

The goal wasn't flattening complexity, it was making it navigable.

The content still needed to support a wide range of educational structures, products, and roles. The work wasn't about oversimplifying that system, it was about making it easier for people to understand where they were, what was available, and how to move through it with less friction.

That shift made the platform feel more responsive to real classroom use and more legible to people evaluating it from a distance.

Making content easier to discover changed how the platform was experienced.

With the updated navigation in place, teachers no longer had to drill through intermediate containers to reach instructional materials. Content hierarchy became actionable at a glance, and the table of contents stayed reachable from every content page.

The full-screen table of contents also gave administrators and reviewers a clearer view of the curriculum in context, helping them understand the structure and scope of the product more quickly. That mattered in higher-stakes evaluation settings, where discoverability and clarity directly influenced adoption decisions.

Better navigation made the product easier to use in the moments that mattered most.

The persistent panel and full-screen table of contents replaced several click-heavy interactions with snappier, context-aware access.

These changes supported more confident, responsive classroom instruction, helping educators keep their flow even when pivoting to new content mid-lesson.

Reduced unnecessary friction

Content hierarchy and materials became actionable at a glance, without drilling through intermediate containers.

Navigation at your fingertips

The persistent panel and full-screen table of contents replaced several click-heavy interactions with faster, context-aware access.

Critical content exposed

These outcomes supported more confident, responsive classroom instruction, helping educators keep their flow when pivoting to new content mid-lesson.

Evergreen access to content

Regardless of a teacher's location, the table of contents stayed reachable from the Browse This Course action on every content page.

The redesigned persistent navigation panel in use during a lesson. The redesigned full-page table of contents.

In products like this, friction doesn't always come from features. Sometimes it comes from how hard the structure is to see.

Making the content easier to discover didn't change what the platform offered, it changed how usable that value felt in practice. That's the difference that made the experience hold up for teachers, reviewers, and the business behind it.

Next project

Next · Terafina

Making a complex product easier to use, without pretending it isn't still complex

View project